“It’s That Bad”: In an Embarrassment to Harvard and Yale, JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS and the American Academy of Pediatrics Publishes Another Great Example of Junk Science – Pertussis Vaccination in Pregnancy

I AM CALLING ON ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES AND FRIENDS AT UNIVERSITIES AND MEDICAL CENTERS IN THE US TO MOVE TO HAVE THEIR UNIVERSITIES DROP THEIR SUBSCRIPTIONS TO THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS UNTIL THIS INCREDIBLY FAKE STUDY IS RETRACTED.  I AM CALLING ON ALL STATE UNIVERSITIES TO DO THE SAME.

You would think now that they know that the public knows that they cook vaccine safety studies, and how they do it, the people from

Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, California;  Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon; Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin; Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and  Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado

who conducted the latest study to attempt to convince the public that TdaP vaccination during pregnancy is safe would try to either do better science, or better hide their bad science.

Nope.

Instead, they stuck w/the tried and true formula: use covariates as confounders, exclude bad outcomes, do not measure fetal deaths…

Here’s the garbage study: Infant Hospitalizations and Mortality After Maternal Vaccination

You won’t believe this.

I’ll start with excluding bad outcomes:

“We also excluded infants of multiple gestation pregnancies…”

NO REASON GIVEN – AND WOMEN W/MULTIPLES WILL SURELY STILL BE VACCINATED (TRANSLATIONAL FAILURE)

“infants born before 34 weeks’ gestation…”

OK. STOP.  REALLY.  PRE-TERM BIRTHS ARE A VERY SERIOUS CONCERN.  WHAT IF TDAP USE IN PREGNANCY CAUSES PRE-TERM BIRTHS???  I’m sure pregnant women would like to know.  IT GETS WORSE:

“…and infants with major birth defects because these infants are at a higher risk of hospitalization and death.”

WHA? WHAT?? INFANTS WITH MAJOR BIRTH DEFECTS??? THAT’S THE F*CKING POINT OF THE STUDY!!!!  OH, AND THEY WERE JUST GETTING STARTED:

“Furthermore, we excluded all infants who died during their delivery hospitalization because cause of death in these infants is often…” [YOU HAVE THE RECORDS, HOW OFTEN??] – BUT WAIT –

‘…a perinatal complication (such as placental abruption) that would likely be unrelated to maternal vaccination”….

I’M GOING FOR MY PITCHFORK ABOUT NOW.  WE KNOW THAT ISSUES WITH THE PLACENTA EXIST DUE TO PROBLEMS WITH THE UNFOLDED PROTEIN RESPONSE AND ER-STRESS, but that’s only part of the issue…

THIS IS NOT SCIENCE. CIRCULAR REASONING RULES.  VACCINES ARE SAFE, SO LET’S NOT DO A VACCINATED VS. UNVACCINATED. VACCINES ARE SAFE, SO LET’S IGNORE THE DATA THAT WE HAVE ALREADY COLLECTED TO DETERMINE IF VACCINES ARE SAFE – BECAUSE VACCINES ARE SAFE.

“Additionally, infants who die during the birth hospitalization may be less likely to be enrolled in the VSD and captured in our data.”

WELL, THEN WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH VACCINE ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING THEN, DON’T WE???

AND THEN THIS GEM:

We also excluded infants with external causes of death (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10] codes S00-T98 and V00-Y98) and infants with external causes of hospitalizations (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes 800-999, E800-E999) due to injury and poisonings because these are unlikely to result from a maternal vaccination. ICD-10 coding was not available for hospitalization diagnoses in the United States during the time of this study.

WAIT, YOU HAD ICD-10 FOR EXTERNAL CAUSES OF DEATH, BUT YOU LOST THE BOOK FOR ‘HOSPITALIZATION DIAGNOSES’???

LOOK AT THE FIGURE, THEY ALSO EXCLUDED CASES THAT HAD MULTIPLE VACCINES.  YOU CAN BET THEY WON’T NOT GIVE MULTIPLE VACCINES TO PREGNANT WOMEN (TRANSLATIONAL FAILURE).

They also excluded >16,000 who had no prenatal care.  Why exclude them?  Oh, they didn’t take folic acid, and were not exposed to pertussis by health care workers who are silent carriers because they vaccinate against pertussis every 10 years.

THEY EXCLUDED THE UNVACCINATED.

junk

THIS IS HARVARD?  THIS IS YALE??  They should ask their faculty with their names on this garbage to request that the ‘study’ be withdrawn.

But, not to worry. The exclusion criteria were approved by…

THE US CDC.

And I never even got to the over-correction (model over-fit) and use of covariates as confounders.  What’s the point?

If I were a pregnant woman, and I was offered Tdap or influenza, I’d get up and leave and find another ob/gyn.  Or I’d home birth.  Yikes.

And I’d leave a copy of this blog article for them.

JUNK SCIENCE KILLS.

No apologies for yelling or profanity.  CDC, just stop.  You’re hurting people.

JLW, allison park, pa Tuesday, March 13, 2018

19 thoughts on ““It’s That Bad”: In an Embarrassment to Harvard and Yale, JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS and the American Academy of Pediatrics Publishes Another Great Example of Junk Science – Pertussis Vaccination in Pregnancy

      1. You are doing REAL work, while the CDC is doing garbage work. Please keep it up, because we need all the help we can get. It is up to well-meaning folks to help each other, since the CDC and other such organizations are actively harming us with their profit-driven lies.

        Like

    1. but the mothers of the unvaccinated infants had been vaccinated while pregnant, so the infants may still show injury…this was the only excluded group that confused me (I would think they’d want to keep that group included – wouldn’t it would increase their “positive” results?)

      Like

  1. Reblogged this on Babble On… and commented:
    Too far. Vaccines in pregnancy. No informed consent. F’d up justification for making the recommendation. If this does not wake up the medical profession from their cognitive dissonance on vaccines, then it is time to for all Americans to opt out of anything other than emergency care from the modern conventional medicine paradigm. Clearly, ‘for profit ‘comes before ‘for people’ with this crowd. If I am wrong, please show me how manipulated studies used to make pregnancy vaccination the standard of care and clear safety signals in post market are anything but a failed experiment. Please show me.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. When is everyone, including you, “Lifebiomedguru”, going to stop preaching to the choir and develop an action plan. YES! You are right! You know you are right. We know you are right!
    When are we going to stand in front of the Obgyn’s and Pediatric offices, and protect the “Lambs” that are showing up for slaughter? When? When?
    Oh my, you are going to threaten to stop your subscriptions? That should really bring about change :))
    Get real. Do something! I’ll show up!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Very telling is the exclusion of women who had a vaccine within 7 days before delivery considering many “spontaneous” births happen well within 7 days of maternal vaccination.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Hi Brittany, I don’t see this exclusion group – is it noted within the study itself?
      I’m wondering if miscarriage/spontaneous abortion/stillbirth is what accounts for the 16K with “no birth hospitalization record”?

      Like

  4. Thank you for posting and illuminating this garbage pit. Maybe I missed it and you covered this, but what accounts for those 16,223 with “no birth hospitalization record”? That’s huge.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. were those records “misplaced”, or did those pregnancies end in miscarriage hence no birth hospitalization record?
      hard to believe that there are this many home births (if that’s what the’d like you to think)

      outrageous to exclude almost 20% of the study group, and then another 20% of the excluded mysteriously have no hospitalization record

      Like

  5. Any way they can poison or kill children, sooner the better for them

    As to injecting pregnant women with vaccines http://whale.to/vaccine/pregnancy_vax_h.html such as flu vaccine, there are 302 VAERS reports of Flu vaccines causing spontaneous abortion http://whale.to/vaccine/miscarriage_vax_h.html. 916 if you include all vaccines. Plus 718 reports for some sort of foetal damage, including 65 cases of foetal death http://whale.to/vaccines/foetal.html Does it look like that is a help to pregnant women? And at most only 1% of cases are reported to VAERS, some put the figure at 1/1,000. http://whale.to/vaccines/ploy1.html

    “Exposure to mercury in utero and in children may cause mild to severe mental retardation and mild to severe motor coordination impairment.” Eli Lilly Data sheet http://whale.to/vaccine/eli_lilly_material_data.html

    check out their birth trauma racket http://whale.to/a/birth_trauma_h.html

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Reminds me of a German report that had examined 5 cases being suspectible to be vaccination damages. In order to qualify for a potential vaccination damage for the German Paul-Ehrlich-Institute the following conditions had to be fullfilled a) there had to be no history of illness before vaccination, b) the damage had to occur within 48 hours after the vaccination, and be a serious and permanent one. Both conditions had been met in those 5 cases. In fact, as for b) the 5 babies and todlers without previous illness had died within 48 hours of giving them the same kind of vaccine (it was against pertussis, but maybe in combination with other vaccines, two cases had been with the same prediatrician bwt, so might have come from the same contaminated batch).The 5 dead babies/todlers were thoroughly examined and in fact had exactly the same kind of changes in their brain, like after an enzephalitis. The stories about what happened after the vaccine till death were also very similar.
    Then the first truly perverse thing happens: Apparently against their own rules, the report came up with another condition that needs to be fullfilled: c) the babies that were not yet 12 months old, were declared to be sudden infant death babies, because each death that cannot be explained is by definition a sudden infant death. Great isn’t it? In particular as the 14 vaccines recommended in early childhood are recommened to be given within the first 14 months now! At that time though where the babies died, the vaccination time had been less determined , it was rather like in the first 2 years or before the kids went to kindergarden (age 3). The sudden infant death miracuously defined 2 of the 5 cases away. But at least the remaining 3 cases qualified for being a vaccine damage. The report was passed on from the national to the European level. And what happened there? For no reason whatsowever, the corresponding European org found no vaccine damage in the remaining 3 cases either ! So the cases were buried officially also on the national level. Since I have read the corresponding report from Paul-Ehrlich-Institute directly on their website, I have stopped believing in any serious examination of cases suspectible of a vaccination damage.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s