Vaccination: What are a Doctor’s Responsibilities?

family_physician

We have read hundreds of newspaper reports on vaccines stating the same mantra on vaccines: they are safe, and effective, and that vaccines do not cause autism.   I share, on a weekly basis, dozens of peer-reviewed research articles with colleagues who hold august positions in Universities that say otherwise. The NIH has called for research proposals to make currently licensed vaccines safer. The medical community of professionals has a strong culture, a tradition of healing that goes back thousands of years. They interface directly with the public in private, one:one dialogs.  As a political force, they are strong.  But they are becoming less cohesive, and increasingly less responsive to their fundamental ethos: first, do no harm.

To maintain cohesion, tough discussion, disagreements and compromises are necessary in the exploration and journey from past medical practices and newer medical practices.  For the individual doctor, it is often easier to remain conservative and conduct practice, rather than stay up to date on the development of alternatives or advances.  In vaccination, as much as they may wish to believe the CDC and Pharma’s rhetoric, an increasing number are recognizing that vaccines do not exist in a medical vacuum; that they can be destructive to certain individuals’ health, and that when take in a wider medical view, they do not belong in a comprehensive medical framework for all individuals.  There exists the “silent aware”; I have spoken with them.  This increasingly aware community includes individuals who work in research in neurodevelopmental disorders.  They state that they are unable to come forward, and speak or act as if vaccines cause injuries out of fear of the loss their license to practice medical, or fear of loss of research funding from government agencies.

Fear thus has a divisive effect between the public, who is becoming increasing vaccine risk aware, and the medical community, who has become increasingly vaccine risk denialist.  If we allow this polarizing influence to persist, we will forestall again the protection of the minds and the general health of our youth.

There are now thousands of stories of specific vaccine injuries, each one eerily similar.  Trusting parents, each one hoping to do right by their child, bring their babies to the pediatrician for a vaccination.  Initially, there appears to be no issue.  However, either that night, or the next day or so, their child would begin crying incessantly, a type of scream that moms never want to hear from their child.  If they call the doctor’s office, they are told it is normal. The child might develop a high fever, and the parents, unaware of the studies that show that Acetominophen after MMR is associated with autism, naturally want to help break the fever.  Often they are told by their doctor’s office that the fever is a normal reaction to the vaccine, and to administer Acetominophen.  This is the first example of medical neglect on the part of the doctor’s office. The child may then start head-banging, and/or begin seizures.  If they experience seizures, the parents are often told by their doctor’s office that a perfectly normal reaction to the vaccine.  No CT scans are ordered.  No urinary biomarkers for evidence of ongoing brain damage.  No intervention to stop the seizures.  These are the second example of medical neglect on the part of the doctor’s office.

The child may then go silent.

When confronted with the eventual diagnosis of autism, the doctor’s office then inform the parent that they are certain “it” wasn’t the vaccines.  This is the third example of medical neglect, because the doctors has thereby denied the parents the diagnosis necessary to obtain funds to help tend to their newly injured child: vaccine-induced encephalopathy-mediated autism.

This story has been captured on film thousands of times by Polly Tommey and the VaXxed team, traveling the country in search of the actual events that are disrupting families’ lives.  It is each individual doctor’s personal responsibility to not partake in vaccine risk denialism.  They are indemnified from lawsuits by the The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34) anyway.

It is a physician’s responsibility to know the benefits and risks of every medical procedure.  With vaccines, it is doubly the physicians’s responsibility to know the risk because they are, in the US, given the august role of “learned intermediaries”.  To partake in vaccine risk denialism is thus doubly negligent, especially given the invisible but nevertheless brutal assault that occurs on some infants’ brains, every single day, as a result of vaccination.

Our predecessors set in place protections for patients from medical negligence in the form of informed consent.  Patients are entitled also to total disclosure to achieve the ability to make their own mind up to consent, or to not consent, to any medical procedure.  In response to the atrocities that occurred in concentration camps in World War II, individuals are protected by informed consent laws for experimental medical procedures.  Due to events like those at Tuskegee, additional protections exist for against unwarranted and unwanted medical experimentation.  Especially strong protections exist for pregnant women, and children.  It is the duty and the responsibility of each and every member of the medical profession to know these restrictions, and to apply them to their own practice of medicine.  In spite of the rhetoric from government agencies such as the CDC, vaccines are poorly tested by weak correlation science, using short periods of time for outcomes.  The rates of adverse health outcomes due to the entire schedule itself has not been studied using an appropriately designed study of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated.

In most cases, long-term testing occurs as post-market surveillance, so-called “pharmocovigilence”. The vaccine injury databases such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Recording System (VAERS) capture between 1-10% of actual vaccine injuries, and each and every case of vaccine injury denial over the phone, or in person, removes another case of vaccine injury reported.  Thus, parents have been making their own reports to VAERS.  Even then, the data in VAERS is perversely ignored; studies using VAERS are dismissed due to a disclaimer stating that the records cannot be used to infer causality.  An automated system developed to the tune of over $1 million dollars was created, and the CDC simply stopped returning phone calls from its developers.  Long-term safety studies via pharmacovigilence does not qualify as science, and thus, vaccine safety science does not exist in the United States.

We stand at a cross-roads, and the medical community has a choice. Nurse practitioners, nurses and office workers/administrators who are witness and are party to these events can choose to remain complicit by extension, or they can act in a manner causing the doctors to accept the responsibility to protect civilians from medical tyranny. Individual pediatricians – to a person – who continue to vaccinate under the CDC schedule without seeking ways to minimize risk will, one day, be held accountable, if not by society, then by their own conscience.  Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is concerned that mass suicides may occur when the medical community wakes up, and constantly is thinking of what careers the depressed and devastated pediatricians might be able to pursue as they wake up to reality.  My answer is in the medical care of helping the injured recover.

Congress should act collectively in a timely and decisive manner to bring an end to this ongoing wholesale slaughter of infant’s brains out of fear of minor childhood illnesses. If they fail to act, the people will surely take control, in spite of the millions of dollars that Pharma pumps into campaigns on both sides.  The AMA and the AAP are failing to protect civilians, and their legitimacy as authorities in the medical community will soon be severely diminished by their failure to take decisive action in response to the surge in neurodevelopmental and autoimmune disorders.  Will the medical community allow itself to be seen as a clear and present danger to the people of the United States? We live in complex times.  However, nothing has changed that dissolves the moral imperative, the legal imperative, and the medical imperative related to the medical community’s responsibility to act against their leadership, and stand up in a concerted manner, with the full support of a growing law community, and with the resulting adoration and support of parents who will forgive you if you step forward.

The medical community therefore needs to join forces – en masse – with the parents and those of us in the scientific and law communities who are awake. Together, as unified force, we need to take action – the responsibility is there, even though the ability to act is complicated.  Every time we fail to let actions follow awareness, we encourage an increasingly cynical pharmaceutical industry to push for more exemptions for product liability.  Such is the case of the clause in the 21st Century Cures Act that allows doctors to enroll patients in clinical trials without their consent, as long as an Institutional Review Board has determined that the treatments and procedures confer minimal risk.  This clause, however, does not undo the other regulations that exist for every experimental medical procedure because no IRB can determine minimal risk before the trial has been conducted.

We cannot allow the mighty and wealthy pharmaceutical industry to make a mockery of conventions and commitments put in place to protect patients from harm from well-intended, but mislead and misinformed physicians.

It is now the responsibility of each and every physician to rise up against their corporate masters.  They must take every step necessary to do no harm.  They must insist on a change of culture in their practice. They must screen for vaccine risk using known risk factors.  They must offer medical exemptions as a choice.  They must take one minute and ask their patients’ parents if they know of any medical reason why their child might be at risk (history of RA in the family, previous vaccine adverse event in parents/siblings/patient).  Each vaccine risk aware physician should author and publish a position article and an editorial in their newspaper.  If the establishment won’t publish their views, I have an outlet prepared for their submissions.

They should be informed that if they establish a private practice, patients will come to them in droves.  They should be reassured that their license is threatened, vaccine risk aware lawyers will help them fight and win their right to work.

If they can’t do this out of ethics, they should do it for the survival of their profession.  If the medical community does nothing, they will continue to lose customers.  They will have abdicated their social contract, violated the public trust, and the vaccine risk aware army will help others find alternative means for health care.

And then we will pass state laws banning specific ingredients in vaccines.

Which we are likely to do anyway.

8 thoughts on “Vaccination: What are a Doctor’s Responsibilities?

  1. I agree 100%. Those at increased risk for vaccine harm include all with family history of autoimmune disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders including autism, ADD, ADHD, anxiety, depression, Schizophrenia and of course prior vaccine reactions in family members or the patient. In reality, everyone is at risk of harm as long as we have ingredients like aluminum in vaccines. It is hard to know for certain who will have their immune system turned against them (autoimmunity) after a vaccine containing aluminum.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I fully agree as well. Rising up is what we must do, or we will no longer have a functional nation. I took the opportunity today, as I always do, to raise the awareness of the bookstore clerk who handled my purchase (“The Salt Fix,” a very important book). She didn’t know, but she does now.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I mentioned this a while back but I still cannot understand it. So, I want to bring it up again… Keep in mind that thus far your book is quite good on finding causes of autism and directing future research toward finding causes, but some of the treatments you consider are just plain derranged.

    Given that your book is about things that cause neurological damage, why do you even consider risperdal, which is KNOWN to cause neurological, nervouw system and cardiovascular damage with HORRIBLE debilitating effects of involuntary movement and even a 20+ year shortened life span, as a treatment for agression and even more ridiculously, hand flapping? Also, (keep in mind I haven’t finished he book) why do you not talk about causes of agression, such as abuse including verbal, sexual and what I can only describe as torture from flickering fluorescents to debilitating intestinal problems, especially in non verbal and poor verbal types? I just cannot accept that you can write a whole book about sources of brain damage and malformation, then go on to recommed psychiatric dope that causes brain damage. I mean, it is just sick. And that is just one drug. They all cause disablement of higher thought areas of the brain. And that’s how they work. They make the “patient” no longer care about what really bothers them, which can be especially dangerous with bowel issues and sexual and physical abuse.

    Have you read Brain Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry yet?

    I am a bit further into your book now, and when you examine the causes of autism you do great work, but this solutions section is still… it is sick.

    Like

    1. I appreciate your feedback – admittedly I did not peruse the safety information on the list of the drugs and compounds being explored. As I’ve said, the list is not an endorsement, merely a summary of the treatments under consideration. Certainly it is not medical advice.

      Like

  4. Please read that book Brain disabling treatments in psychiatry by Breggin and revise. It would be nice if you spent as much care with treatments as with causes. I think your book is a great starting point… but you need to add to it.

    Like

  5. Please read that book Brain disabling treatments in psychiatry by Breggin and revise. It would be nice if you spent as much care with treatments as with causes. I think your book is a great starting point… but you need to add to it.

    edit: and some of those treatments should be banned.

    Like

  6. Um, and to comment on your article. I think you do not realize how systemically corrupt our western culture and governments are. When Merck’s own scientists sue it for creating fraud to bolster the apparent effeftiveness of the measles vaccine, when Bayer knowingly ships HIV tainted blood to Europe, when the CDC can put out a “study” (co-authored by Dr. Thompson) calling mercury a cognitive enhancer, when you see things like the Police in Britain putting honest building inspectors on blacklists which resulted then in the Grenfell towers fire… I mean, the list goes on and on and on… I highly advise watching Newsbud and Corbett report for more (Corbett actualky has a video about hoq the financial system is so corrupt that no matter what is done the Wall Street creeps find some technological way around it… forget which vid…)….

    We simply have a society that is so irredemably corrupt that the revolution you seek will not happen. These monied animals and “auhoritay” (I spelled that that way in reference to South Park)… and this organized crime syndicate we call a government (go look up the Sibel Edmonds video on pizza gate (it is not about a cult. This is just how the crooks work) and how the lower level FBI were being duped into gathering dirt on Judges and Politicians thinking they were catching them only to be shut down. The dirt was then used to select blackmailable judges and to blackmail politicians amicable to those in power)… these organized criminal who have taken over every powerful position there is to be had will drive us into a poverty… not only financially, but a poverty of health, and quality of life and all else as well as they drain everything good from the world for their own benefit.

    We will simply descend into an age darker than we can currently imagine.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s