It’s a funny thing when a perpetrator makes a confession but has no idea that they have confessed.
It’s Nov 11, 2020 and the jury is still out on the safety of COVID19 vaccines. Not a single study has been conducted that can be used to conclude that any COVID19 is sufficiently safe for widespread or even limited use in any specific subpopulation.
Yet here in the piece published by The Telegraph we see some Royal-something-or-other and the British Academy in the UK calling for the criminalization of public rational discourse on COVID19 vaccine risks:
“It should be made a criminal offence to spread anti-vaxx myths and the public should report offenders, the Royal Society and British Academy have said amid concerns that baseless fears over a coronavirus vaccine will damage uptake.”
Really now, Royal Something-or-other? Tell us more about these “baseless fears”… how do you, or how does anyone, yet know they are “baseless”?
“A rapid review on Covid-19 Vaccine Deployment has called for people to be “inoculated” against misinformation, which can spread rapidly on social media.”
Really now, British Academy? Since there is not yet any “information”, how in the world can you and the Royal-something-or other or anyone know what is “information” and what is “misinformation”?
“Several countries already have laws against disseminating information that is harmful to public health, and Singapore has recently carried out four prosecutions for coronavirus offences under its Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA).”
And I suppose if your friends all set themselves and fire and jumped off a bridge, you’d do that, too?
“Professor Melinda Mills, the director of the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science at the University of Oxford and the lead author of the review, said it was critical to address genuine concerns about the vaccine while preventing misleading facts from spreading on the internet.”
Oh, I see. The public is supposed to accept the APPEARANCE of rational discourse for its substitution, namely, jail time. Got it.
‘This information can be really damaging, and it’s clever how they spread it through memes and memorable things,’ she said. ‘These groups are very skilled. They feed on fear, that little grain of truth, and they amplify it.
‘It’s not very interesting when the Government produces passive web pages that say vaccinations are safe. The anti-vaxxers turn everything into a show – they put out things that are engaging, that are visual to their members.
‘Social media channels try to capture this misinformation, but they can’t get everything and so it’s important that the public can spot it so that they don’t share it. Most people aren’t bad, they just don’t realise they are sharing a whole load of misinformation.’
Are we still talking about COVID19 vaccines, about which we have zero safety information? “Most people aren’t bad”… What Mills and the Church of Vaccinology will never accept is that 50% of people in the US are not, under their definition, “anti-vaccine”.
“Experts are concerned that uptake for a Covid vaccine will fall short unless more is done to address misconceptions on social media. Recent research has shown that around 36 per cent of people in Britain say they are either uncertain or very unlikely to be vaccinated against the virus.”
Ah, we see what you did there. “X% are either very unlikely to be vaccinated against the virus or immolate themselves for your entertainment”. Clever, clever. But we saw it.
“Prof Mills added: “There are real knowledge voids. The public thinks it takes decades to make a vaccine, so it has to be communicated that it is safe. There are always going to be side-effects, and that has to be acknowledged too.”
Prof Mills has just fallen in the to “anti-vaccine” category and had better be very careful about her next statement!
“Everyone is concerned about this rushed vaccine, so let’s talk about it. There needs to be a dialogue, and that will work better at a local level.”
Enjoy your stay in the Gulag, Dr. Mills.
Here is the US, it’s no better. In fact, it’s worse. Our Vaccine Priests and Priestesses have been at it since August, when there was even less preliminary information on the safety profiles of COVID19 vaccines. Check of this piece from CNN:
“‘We are behind here,’ said Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health. ‘We haven’t done a good job of getting [coronavirus vaccine] information out there.’
What information, Francis? It was AUGUST.
“There isn’t much time to educate Americans about the Covid vaccine. Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, and others say they expect a vaccine could be on the market in December or January.”
Educate them with what, Tony?
“‘We know it’s really important, especially for a new vaccine, to start these conversation early,’ said Chelsea Clinton, who does vaccine advocacy work with the Clinton Foundation. ‘We saw how important that was many decades ago when the polio vaccine first emerged in the mid-1950s. So we know what we need to be doing. We’re just not doing it.'”
“These conversations”… require data. We should have public health policies based on science, not idle speculation. We have approached you and many others repeatedly Chelsea, to have “these conversations”. You mean you want to have decrees, monologues without responses, passively accepted statements without questions and by all means no rational discourse.
Confession after confession. I wonder if Chelsea, Tony and Francis would agree with the Boston Globe that public rational discourse on vaccine risk and safety should be a “hanging offense”.
As an expert in translational research failure, I’m almost ready to call this one a dismal failure.
Just look at the data on how they conducted the translational research:
(1) Skipped animal studies to test for #PathogenicPriming leading to disease enhancement.
(2) Combined Phased 2/3 trials.
(3) Conducted early (absolutely) unethical “results peeking”
(4) Made unwarranted conclusions from initial, woefully underpowered results.
(5) Starting calling for prison sentences for anyone who dare question the safety of their vaccines – before any credible data existed on the safety of their vaccines.
This is 100% proof that vaccine safety science on COVID19 vaccines is fraudulent.
Makes one wonder who should be imprisoned: the victims or the fraudsters?
Great piece, and you’ve done a fantastic job of calling these hypocrites out. I will just say that there a few spelling mistakes which need fixing in order for people to share it widely and have the information actually taken-in. That’s all! Keep up the amazing work.
I enjoy your writing style, facts delivered with humour.
SNIPPED: (1) Skipped animal studies to test for #PathogenicPriming leading to disease enhancement.
My comment: China stopped vaccine trials on the previous pandemic because of this key point — that the vaccine on trial caused the subsequent flu to be enchanced, and fatal, to the test animals. Wasn’t this about 10 years ago?
Thanks you for your article.
Not just the Chinese. The https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/02/07/2019-ncov-vaccine-recommended-readings/
Hey Dr. Lyons-Weiler, saw your Youtube video recently that has been making it’s way around (October 26th). I was curious regarding your thoughts on the vaccine and the blood coagulating symptoms of COVID. My husband had it and had a blood clot. Are you thinking that the vaccine in helping generate these proteins (right?) would also potentially result in the same symptoms in people (which could be even more detrimental)? Btw, loved also seeing you speak at VIE 2019 🙂 Love the work you are doing!
Lindsey, the coagulopathy seen in some cases seems to me to likely be due (hypothesis, no new data) to
autoimmunity against a key protein or its receptors – S100 calcium channel protein, something I predicted
in April. I have urged studies to find autoantibodies in patients who crash. I hope you husband is doing better,
thanks for the comment!
Have you seen this?
Dr. Weiler, what does it mean to combine phase 2 and 3 trials, and why is that problematic? I have no scientific background so am genuinely curious about this.
Tom, Thank you for the question. In standard drug trialing, the process of Phases allows the determination of likely and possible risks. Think of Phase 2/3 combined trials as avoiding double jeopardy. Bad reactions or adverse events that happen in Phase 2 can then be confirmed if they happen again in Phase 3. Combining Phase 2 and Phase 3 into one prevents learning and validation of adverse events, and it absolutely a form of cutting corners. In vaccine studies, it is common to study a list of “solicited” adverse events… where are they to come from if there has not been a prior Phase 2 trial? In reality, long-term safety of vaccines is studied in POST-MARKET surveillance – put the product on the market, and see who gets hurt. Every vaccine on the CDC schedules (pediatric and now adult) are still in long-term safety trials. No one is ever consented properly for the long-term safety studies of vaccines.