The “Surge” being seen in countries that use flu vaccines can reasonably be attributed to mismanagement of our public health statistics on respiratory viruses – and due to immune damage from the influenza vaccine.
TOMORROW IS HALLOWE’EN – All Hallow’s Eve – a religious traditional where ghouls and goblins roam the streets in search of something… tricks, or treats.
CDC’s latest trick is diagnostic substitution of “Influenza” for “COVID19” and it’s scaring people literally to death.
Let’s line up some facts:
Fact 1. CDC Uses False Numbers for Influenza to Scare People. CDC used to track deaths from “Influenza” separately – until 2014, the year in which they came up with the “Pneumonia+Influenza” or “Influenza Disease” hat-trick. By combining deaths from pneumonia untested into “Influenza Disease” they have been successfully scaring Americans over “the Flu” to push the flu vaccine. [Read a full article on this here – the article that was Censored by LinkedIN.]
In 2014, 11% of cases of “Influenza Disease” were bona fide influenza cases.
In this graph, I show the estimated number of bona fide influenza cases per year after 2014 combined with the reported number of influenza cases.
The next time someone says “55,000” or “80,000” deaths from infleunza per year, share this article with them.
Fact 2. In 2020, Influenza is Missing. The next fact to consider is that CDC appears to have abandoned tracking influenza in 2020. How convenient. Look at this series of Influenza Cases by type per year. Look at the small insert number of positive tests reported per week – they represent the onset of the flu season for the next season coming one. We’ll be comparing those insert figures to the data available as of Oct 30, 2020 (Week 44 of 52).
Now look at the same figure for the 2019-2020 season (data available up to October 17, 2020, this year).
Fact 3. Studies have shown that the influenza vaccine appears to make people more susceptible to coronavirus infection and infection by other non-influenza viral infections. There’s the Wolf study that supposes the mechanism by which coronavirus infection is more likely following infleuza vaccine is “Viral Interference”
Wolff GG. Influenza Vaccination and Respiratory Virus Interference Among Department of Defense Personnel During the 2017-2018 Influenza Season. Vaccine 2020;38 (2):350-354.
I suspect it’s thimerosal, which inhibits the protein ERAP1, necessary for our immune systems to fold proteins properly in response to new pathogens. (Source: “Screening Identifies Thimerosal as a Selective Inhibitor of Endoplasmic Reticulum Aminopeptidase 1“).
See also Ben Cowling’s study “Increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections associated with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine”
Denialists will say “there’s no evidence this is true for COVID19”. Fact: there is no evidence that it is NOT true for COVID19, either, and COVID19 is a coronavirus responsible for respiratory illness. Fact-checker, check yourself.
I’ve shown in previous posts that diseases of unknown origin got their start in 1976 with the onset of national whole-population influenza vaccine efforts, and also that the uptake in infleunza vaccines in a given year increases the likelihood of influenza for the next two years. So there is evidence – detectable at the population level – of harm to the immune system from influenza vaccination program.
We also know from animal studies in past attempts to develop coronavirus vaccines that coronavirus vaccines tend to cause disease enhancement – i.e., they make infection from coronaviruses worse. Yet Fauci and Moderna and FDA and all vaccine manufacturers decided to skip this essential step in their rush to get a COVID19 vaccine developed, making guinea pigs out of the human beings.
So let’s put it all together:
There is no way that CDC is getting COVID19 numbers right
They are likely conflating COVID19 “presumed” cases with non-tested cases of “influenza disease” (remember, that influenza + non-tested pneumonia from bacteria, RSV, and SV and other Coronaviruses”.
The “Surge” being seen in countries that use flu vaccines can reasonably be attributed to mismanagement of our public health statistics on respiratory viruses and due to immune damage from the influenza vaccine.
To me, it seems CDC is the largest threat to public health in the United States.
Trick or treat?
You can watch a video on Facebook where Dr. Jack discusses the CDC data.
Hey Dr. Jack I recently saw and greatly enjoyed your interview on the Robert Scott Bell show. You mentioned something about the fact that you know for sure that the Sars-Cov2 virus has had it’s full genome sequenced. I was wondering if you were familiar with Dr. Thomas Cowans book The Contagion Myth and his description of how it has been wrongly claimed that SarsCov-2 has been isolated and purified (and thus how could they have sequenced the full genome) much less been proven to cause the disease called covid-19. Being a layperson and woefully out of my depth on these heady and complex subjects I would like to at least try and understand why doctor Cowan (and others like virologist Stefan Lanka who awhile back offered 100,00 euros of his own money to anyone who could isolate the measles virus and then prove it causes disease and to my knowledge no one has claimed that prize to date) would claim that viruses or bacteria are not the external causes of disease but rather the body’s natural reaction to some sort of toxicity or deficiency ? Dr. Cowans description of the protocol used to “prove” viruses cause cell damage in the lab seemed pretty ridiculous from a common sense point of view but perhaps his description is massive oversimplification. Any light you could shed on this assuming I could even understand it would be appreciated. I think an interview or debate between you and Dr. Cowan would be very illuminating because I seem to be getting two opposite opinions on the nature and contagiousness of viruses from two obviously intelligent people. Thanks for your indulgence and keep up the great work you are doing a service to humanity with your transparency and speaking truth to power.
Scott, thanks for the comment.
I always point people to these >33K genomes stored at NCBI.
The fact is transmission chains are reflected in the phylogenetics of these sequences – from person to person.
If the virus didn’t exist, a few thigs would also have to line up:
(1) The original shotgun sequencing would not have led to nucleotide sequences that match SARS and other beta-coronaviruses
(2) The phylogenetics would not faithfully capture known transmission histories
(3) I would not have found a SARS-CoV-2 like spike protein encoding sequencece in a “SARS” genome sequence deposited in the
sequence databanks in 2005 (!)
The virus has been isolated many thousands of times, sequenced. SARS sequences have been trasffered over the internet and downloaded
to labs and labs have constructed the viral genome in the lab and the SARS virus can infect cells once infected.
I respect Dr. Cowan and other concerned with this issue, but we cannot afford this particular rabbit hole any longer, my time is better spent doing additional studies and providing declarative statements defending human and civil rights (uncompensated).
Thanks so much for your prompt reply doc and I completely understand the implications of going down “rabbit holes” since I’ve been doing that A LOT during this 2020 year. I have learned a great deal much of it quite disturbing but unfortunately I think most people (many of my family members included) have completely abandoned their critical thinking skills in favor of swallowing the mainstream fear based narrative whole and in doing so never get to listen to very credentialed people like yourself and others who are speaking out against so many aspects of what is happening. I am going to forward your answer to Dr. Cowan (if I can locate him) and see what he has to say in regards to his own research and how/why his opinion varies from yours so widely on the contagious (or not) nature of viruses and bacteria. Keep up the incredible work as humanity is in dire need of someone using REAL science in the defense of their civil rights and I am delighted to have another source of information to help in understanding these complex issues so much thanks for that.
I realize that this might get tedious (I hope not) for you James and I’m not necessarily trying to stir the pot so to speak or be confrontational in any way but per our ongoing discussion in this thread about the isolation of the SarsCov-2 virus I actually got a response from Dr. Cowan about what you said (which I copied in it’s entirety) and I’ll paste his response below. There is no need whatsoever for you to respond to this especially considering you already said you didn’t care to go down this rabbit hole but this description of his makes sense to me however as I stated previously I am woefully out of my depth here and it’s overwhelming trying to wade through and make sense of material like this from two obviously qualified medical professionals. Anyways I enjoy your work and commend your courageous and substantial efforts in the face of the medical tyranny we are experiencing. Thanks for reading and God bless.
“Its very simple to isolate caffeine from coffee, you grind it, filter it, and centrifuge it and then prove that you one have caffeine. You don’t put the coffee in a big vat with tea, chocolate, etc and then claim you know the caffeine could have only come from the coffee Thats what virolgists do. When you ask them why they don’t just take snot, filter it, centrifuge it and then show EM pictures of only virus they say there is not enough virus to see, so they have to culture it in tissues that contain the EXACT same DNA. They will never see this, there is nothing to debate, my question is if there isn’t enough virus to see with common sense isolation they how in the hell is it going to kill us all. Tom”
I cannot presume the text below is from Dr. Cowan. Nevertheless, they don’t take snot, “they” take samples of sputum, or samples from nasopharygeal swabs, and “they” can sequence the virus reproducibly. For example, in the Marine recruit study, they successfully sequenced over 1/2 of the samples that tested positive via PCR for the presence of the virus. The study authors, however, failed to sequence a large percentage – which tells us the PCR test likely has a much higher false postive rate than has been surmised. They sequenced genomes out of 36 samples (35 recruits total) out of 51 total
PCR positive tests. That’s consistent w/a 42.6% FPR. Basile et al. (2020) reported a false positive rate of RT-qPCR testing of 11%; Lee (2020) reported that in a collection of reference samples – sent to him to validate a nucleotide sequence-based testing protocol he was developing – 30% of were mislabeled as “COVID19 positive” and 20% mislabeled as “COVID19 negative”.
The marine study authors did not realize their implied False Positive Rate, but it’s there. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2029717
I’d suggest reading the literature rather than rely on my opinion alone.
Basile et al. – 11%
Dr. Lee’s study –
You can’t have FPs without True positives.
Again thanks for all the information James and again no need to reply as I will consider this discussion closed but yes that was copied and pasted directly from the email I got from Dr. Cowan himself assuming firstname.lastname@example.org is correct since he sent me the reply directly from the messenger app.