The BIGGEST Next Battle on COVID-19 That You Don’t Know Your Position On Yet

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD

4/20/2020

BY ANY ESTIMATION, I have been reliably and consistently 30 to 45 days ahead of the curve on issues related to COVID-19. That’s the benefit of having done indepedent reseach leading to a book on Ebola. I called for social distancing before anyone knew why I was proposing that we not place our hands above our shoulders in public, stop shaking hands, and stop attending large gatherings. I nailed it in my revised hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was likely a laboratory escape, but not man-made. I’ve recast “Immune Enhancement” more properly as “Pathogenic Priming” – a term all will get used to hearing when Phase I trials become Phase II trials and people start getting infected w/SARS-CoV-2 following vaccination and start dying at even higher rates due to disease enhancement caused by Pathogenic Priming from SARS-CoV-2 vaccination – something the vaccine developers SHOULD have tested for in animal studies, but skipped.

Call it a crystal ball, call it the product of insight of thirty-five years of non-stop learning in all areas of Science that I find merit my attention…

Today, 4/19/2020, I’m publishing that a major battle is brewing that neither side is yet aware of. It’s probably the most controversial aspect of COVID-19 public health policy, personal choice and the urge to “return to normalcy”. People who pick one side will see clearly why they are on one side; people who choose the other side will either be (a) bent on securing a massive revenue stream for allopathy and continuation of the centralization of faux authority on public health at CDC, or (b) so deeply conditioned and already convinced that even while they call for their personal, human, and constitional rights to be secured and defending, that they have already given up to their oppressors as all-mighty, all-powerful, and they will fight against their own best interest thinking they are defending their freedoms.

I’m talking about Private vs. Mandatory testing.

Private. As in SECRET. As in EYES ONLY. YOUR EYES ONLY.

Oh, you may think you have an opinion about this already. If you are against private COVID-19 testing, and you’re new to the topic, trust me, you won’t agree with yourself in a week. It will be a weird week for you. Your mind wil feel closed, under attack. It will hurt, a little. That’s cognitive disequilibrium, and it is state of mind in which you are about to learn something.

For me, it’s been a weird two weeks, since I first brought up Private, Non-Compulsory In-Home Antibody Testing in the #IPAKBacktoWork Plan. Why interesting? Because everywhere I discuss it, I get kicked in the ass. For wanting the choice for all. It is me? Is this thing one? CHOICE. FOR ALL. BETTER YET – PRIVATE CHOICE. Not Bill Gate’s option. The IPAK option.

Evidently, post-COVID, major portions of freedom-loving America have already conceded, in their subconcious, the right of the government to test them for COVID-19, at any time, and to report those results to CDC. This portion – who in other settings spend 18 hours a day fighting an increasingly unwinnable fight to preserve the right to determine what we inject into our bodies – are evidently so deeply conditioned on the fallacy that “Testing Means Reporting” that they cannot read the word “Private” without reading “Mandatory”.

I have set up interviews to educate people on Private vs. Compulsory testing. That helped a little.

I’ve spent hours and hours answering questions online with hundreds of people. To little effect.

I’ve written articles explaining in great detail the differences between Private and Clinical testing.

And here I am, again, 12 something AM in the morning, writing another article, fighting the urge to explain yet again.

I won’t win that fight. I’ll give in. Let me try not to, because I’ve already explained it so many other times, so many other articles.

So let me try to unprogram you.

Read this sentence:

“Private (Non-Compulsory) Immunity vs. Mandatory Clinical, Reported Vaccination”

Now read it again, out loud:

“Private (Non-Compulsory) Immunity vs. Mandatory Clinical, Reported Vaccination”

And, take breath, and close your eyes and think of that sentence, and what it means to you for 10 seconds.

Now read this one:

“Private (Non-Compulsory) Testing vs. Mandatory Clinical, Reported Testing”

I hope that help you liberate yourself.

You of course can, and should choose which side of the Private vs. Bill Gates testing you are on. Those who want “NO TESTING!” are covered by the #IPAKBack2Work plan because no one will know if you are testing, or not testing. You’re good. It’s included. For real.

To all, good luck when the battle comes. Because those who want to perputuate massive profits in allopathy and centralized authority in the CDC are hell-bent and already working to

(1) Force you to test in your home and report.

(2) Force you to carry some proof of immunity.

(3) Restrict your rights to participate in society w/out presenting such proof of immunity (Vaccine Cards, Quantum Dot Tatoos, RFID Nose Rings, whatever).

(4) Transfer all of their new authority – which you gave them because you did not win the decisive battle that will win the war – to all other vaccine.

(5) Outlaw vaccine skepticsm speech. Goodbye CHD. Goodbye ICAN. Goodbye IPAK. Hello, Australian Rules Police State.

DEMAND YOUR RIGHT TO SELF-TESTING W/ZERO REPORTING. WHERE THIS GOES DEPENDS 100% ON YOUR ACTIONS. TELL YOUR CONGRESSIONAL REPS NOW – EMAIL, PHONE AND TELEPHONE CALLS – THAT YOU WANT TO BE ABLE TO MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND ABOUT WHEN YOU GO BACK TO WORK BASED ON YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION FROM YOUR PRIVATE TEST.

To those still skeptical if it’s even POSSIBLE to know your own COVID-19 status w/out reporting: That’s Clinical Testing, not Private Testing.

Ever take your own temperature? In the privacy of your own home? Did you report it? Were you compelled to report it? Did you take your temperature “voluntarily”? Or did you just take your temperature.

Non-Compulsory is Not “Voluntary” Voluntary implies participation in a program.

The #IPAKBacktoWork Program defends your personal liberties and rights to #KnowYourStatus without ever having to report it – to anyone.

Do you think Big Pharma and Big Medicine and CDC want you to have that level of autonomy? That level of freedom?

Do you want to know your status? Can you go to CVS or RiteAid and buy a COVID-19 in-home antibody test assay, like you can an EPT?

No.

That’s an option that you cannot exercise.

Because FDA won’t allow it.

I have ZERO financial stake in the game of COVID-19 testing.

No Quid Pro Quo. NADA.

If you do nothing, mandatory testing and all the rest will surely come.

Because FDA does allow that.

Simple. #IPAKBacktoWork.

For those wondering “will we even succeed it we try”?

The answer, of course, is you. Will you do your civic duty to participate in your own self-goverance, or will your fear prevent you from claiming that which is already yours?

It’s 100% up to you. I ask you to do all you can do every day. If you have already done so, thank you. Please share with others. Again and again.

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “The BIGGEST Next Battle on COVID-19 That You Don’t Know Your Position On Yet

  1. Oh, without a doubt. It wont be much of a discussion though, its a given. Its the culmination of a 20 year project and necessary step to implement Agenda 2030. Gates and the Pandemic Industrial Complex have engineered A Health 9/11 event. Interesting WHO declared the Pandemic on 3/11. Coincidence?

    Anyways here is a condensed timeline. Don’t expect you to post this but I might as well share it

    2002-Total Information Awareness (TIA). Based on the concept of predictive policing, TIA aimed to digitally collect detailed information about individuals in order to anticipate and prevent crimes before they were committed. TIA was the aim of the Information Awareness Office (IAO) established by DARPA in 2002. Eerily, the IAO’s logo employed the Masonic pyramid and all-seeing eye of the reverse side of the dollar bill casting its vision over the globe, with Francis Bacon’s scientia est potestia (“knowledge itself is power”) as a motto

    Following public criticism that this technology could potentially lead to a mass surveillance system, the IAO was defunded by Congress in 2003. However, several IAO projects continued to be funded and merely run under different names, as revealed by Edward Snowden during the course of the 2013 mass surveillance disclosures.

    2008, Cass Sunstein, Harvard law professor and adviser to Obama, wrote a controversial paper advocating the use of covert agents in order to infiltrate online communities. The Snowden files confirmed that intelligence agencies monitor sites including YouTube and Facebook, attempt to “control, infiltrate, manipulate and warp online discourse” and even carry out “false flag operations” in order to discredit targets.

    2012, the Obama administration announced more than $200 million in funding for ‘‘Big Data Research and Development Initiative’.’ Information Innovation Office, explains Lee, has replaced the Information Awareness Office. The first wave of agency commitments includes National Science Foundation (NSF), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Geological Survey, and Department of Defense (including DARPA

    2016- Klaus Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum predicted Smart technology devices will, during the coming decade, be integrated with our bodies for behaviour monitoring, location data, health functions and real-time identification . Smart tattoos and other unique chips could help with identification and location. Digital tattoos not only look cool but can perform useful tasks, like unlocking a car, entering mobile phone codes with a finger point or tracking body-processes. 

    2017-At the annual summit in the United Nations ECOSOC Chamber, ID2020 adopted “the platform of change” and started the ID2020 Alliance, with funding from major donor Rockefeller Foundation and the digital technology consultant firm Accenture. Other founding partners were GAVI – The Vaccine Alliance, Microsoft and IDEO.org (a design and consultant firm with partners like The Rockefeller Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and The Bezos Family Foundation). Participants included Intel, IBM, Verizon, Samsung, NEC, and SAP. The Alliance featured a very tight connection between big tech companies, foundations, and vaccine and health interests.

    2017-Dr Fauci said there will be a surprise outbreak during the Trump administration. He said this in a speech in January 2017 -given at Georgetown University on Pandemic Preparedness

    2017- CEPI was founded in Davos by the governments of Norway and India, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the World Economic Forum in 2017. Its mission is to stimulate and accelerate the development of vaccines against emerging infectious diseases and enable access to these vaccines for people during outbreaks.

    2017-December. The National Institutes of Health announced that it is lifting a funding pause dating back to October 2014 on gain-of-function (GOF) experiments involving influenza, SARS, and MERS viruses.

    2018- “The Platform for Good Digital Identity” started in order to “advance good, user-centric digital identities”. Partners include ID2020, Accenture, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Cisco, The World Bank, European Commission, United Nations and newly founded advocacy groups like One World Identity, World Identity Network and Security Identity Alliance. It is a big push that besides refugee identification and disease control is packaged as a solution to concerning issues like human trafficking and child marriages.

    2019, the Strategic National Stockpile was transferred from the CDC to BARDA, and BARDA’s budget was increased by $722 million to a total of $2.2 billion. The stockpiles for life-saving medicines and medical equipment had been depleted during the bogus H1N1 influenza epidemic in 2009. The emergency stockpile was never replenished with essential medical equipment, therapeutics, or personal protective equipment (PPE) for doctors and nurses. The lives of both patients in need of ventilators, and the lives of medical professionals were put at increased risk of death.

    BARDA activities are not subject to FOIA requests. How convenient.

    September 20, 2019 – ID2020 and partners launch program to provide digital ID with vaccines

    October 18, 2019 Bill Gates funded study of Event 201 at John Hopkins University along with the World Economic Forum, simulating a pandemic eerily similar to Wuhan Virus. Attended by George Gao of China CDC

    October 2019- draft of
    Crimson Contagion 2019 exercise conducted from January-August in 2019- FunctionalExercise scenario was based on a novel influenza A(H7N9) virus that originates in China and is antigenically distinct (not matched ) from stockpiled vaccines.

    2019-November 7. Bill Gates predicted a coronavirus-style pandemic would sweep the population in a Netflix documentary , in episode titled Next Pandemic. In the episode, titled The Next Pandemic, producers visit a wet market in Lianghua, China, where animals are killed and their meat is sold in the same place. Bit of Preprogramming there me thinks

    2019- Dec 16, China has announced the goal of launching an innovative national vaccine tracking system before March 31, 2020. According to media reporting by China Daily on December 16, 2019, a recent circular jointly issued by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) and the National Health Commission says ‘this system will enable the traceability of all vaccines on the Chinese market.

    January 13, 2020 Researchers at Moderna and the NIH choose sequence for an mRNA vaccine and began to mobilize toward clinical manufacture.

    January 13,2020 Former CDC director Julie L. Gerberding sold 102,000 shares of Mercks stock (she is EVP) . The stock was sold for $9,119,000

    January 13, 2020, Agnes Buzyn, still France’s Health Minister, classifies chloroquine as a “poisonous substance,” from now on only available by prescription. An astonishing move, considering that it has been sold off the shelf in France for half a century.

    January 15, 2020 China and US sign trade deal where China promises to protect US intellectual property rights (eg patents on drugs, vaccines, etc)

    January 16 , 2020 GAVIs CEO Seth Berkley wrote an article for World Economic Forum “At a time of increasing nationalism and a rejection of globalism, infectious disease is a reminder that we are interconnected and all have a stake in global health security.

    January -2020 , World Economic Forum’s release of the White Paper Reimagining Digital Identity: A Strategic Imperative. A paper written with financial support from the ID2020 partner Accenture with the message that the world is in need for a more secure digital identification because of “fraud, identity theft and misuse or abuse of personal data” in the current fragmented systems.

    January 23, 2020. The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) unveiled funding for early-stage vaccine programs. 

    Cambridge based Moderna disclosed that it’s working with federal researchers on a candidate, and now it’ll have financial backing from CEPI. 

    Pennsylvania-based Inovio Pharmaceuticals scored $9 million in funding for its own program, and CEPI is further expanding a partnership with the University of Queensland which has extensive partnerships with Wuhan Institutions including Wuhan Institute of Technology.

    Etc….

    1. I don’t know how old you are but yeah the rabbit hole is pretty deep. It goes back more than 20 years. Trying to explain it to people could be likened to convincing a blind, rainbow denying Eskimo in the Arctic that double rainbows in Hawaii happen everyday.

      Speaking of predictive programming, I am reminded of a 1958 Mike Wallace interview of Aldous Huxley where he predicted the future technocracy and said among other things old forms of terror and oppression would be dispensed with and in the future people would love their slavery.

      Soon people will be jumping through fun hoops on command to earn crypto tokens between episodes of “running man” and “rollerball” while awaiting their final blissful transcendence on “carousel”.
      Like a lot of people I want to be a Logan. But I doubt there will be a “sanctuary”. They’ve already factored those with eyes to see into their equation. But I’ll keep talking. If only for fear that I might start seeing a beautiful suite of clothes on the naked Emperor myself if I don’t. Everyone here should keep talking too. We have everything to gain and not much left to lose except maybe our souls.

  2. I’m sorry, I know that people on the front lines of this are stressed to the max, But, I think we are witnessing an extraordinary failure of industrial medicine! I am utterly depressed every time I turn on NPR and hear NOTHING about how to be/stay healthy, except for masks, social distancing, quarantining, and tanks of disinfectant. I would like to know if this is how aspiring doctors, in medical school, are taught to treat a bad cold or case of the flu.

    I think there needs to be huge investigative effort when this is all over as to possible co-triggers for terrible cases, beyond the co-morbidities of high blood pressure and diabetes. It strikes me that a lot of people are getting very ill in populations that are probably compelled to get the annual flu vaccine. This year’s vaccine was a mix of 3 or 4 viruses or virus parts.

    And I think our public health administrations need to be talking to people who got sick but suffered few problems and finding out how they took care of themselves, and turning around and educating doctors and the rest of the public with those anecdotes. Because I expect there may’ve been huge individual differences in how people took care of themselves when they began to feel sick that may’ve led either to wellness a few days later, or to the ER. We need to know/examine those stories.

    In a very toxic world, a healthcare system that can’t or won’t talk about detoxification, nutrition, and vitamin deficiencies/supplements, but only likely more toxic pharmaceuticals and possibly toxic vaccines (flu vaccines that still have mercury in them, for instance) is a healthcare system that no one needs.

    1. I raised the question of the flu vaccine a couple months ago. I pointed out that, since we know the flu vaccine can increase susceptibility to coronaviruses in general (there are studies), it’s reasonable to hypothesize that it might increase susceptibility to this, too, and that we should be asking for the flu vaccine status of everyone hospitalized for this so we can track that information.

      People flipped out on me for “making an unsubstantiated claim,” when all I was suggesting was that we GATHER DATA, because we can’t go back and assess data we don’t have. But this is the kind of nonsense we’re up against. Hypotheses are no longer treated as acceptable, because you have to have “proof” that they’re right before you can call for gathering evidence to determine whether they’re right.

  3. I’m amazed Doc. I find someone that has some knowledge on the topic that I actually agree with. Good to officially meet you, and thank you for speaking up.

  4. Dr. Lyons Weiler, may I have your permission to start a petition using your language around antibodies? If so, would you like me to mention you in the text of the petition? Thank you.

  5. I’m 100% in favor of private testing! Thanks for making us aware of this.

    The other issue I’m mystified by is why no one is interested in immunity. If you look at all the ships infected by SARS-Cov-2, there is a consistent 80-85% who do not test positive for the virus despite extensive exposure, and 10% who test positive and have no symptoms. WHY?

    There has to be an explanation for this: diet/nutrition, prior exposure and antibodies to other coronavirus, etc. If we knew what made people immune, and it was something simple like adequate selenium levels, we might be able to make almost everyone immune, and help prevent other illness at the same time. No vaccines, no toxic drugs.

  6. Its not you exactly, but when I learned that the test kits provided by the CDC (a private company) were contaminated with covid19 it provokes the thought that WTF how does that even happen? ………………………………………………………..WE CANNOT TRUST ANYONE USING ANYTHING ON US…PERIOD !! Our governments are EVIL TO THE CORE and ARE HELL BENT ON KILLING 90% of us. THAT’S THE ISSUE,and everyone knows there are more lies being told by govt’s than truths.
    Test results will be used against us,opting out of testing will be used against us. We DO still have the right to refuse care that we do not trust.

  7. I have a bit more hope. We are at a cross-roads Full totalitarian or full freedom. I think a lot of people are seeing what “full totalitarian” will look like. I’m choosing liberty.

  8. I’m 100% with you on this. People should have the right to have themselves tested for their own personal information, without concerns that someone else will use that testing against them.

  9. Very good article on PCR testing:

    https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/was-covid-19-test-meant-detect-virus?

    … “PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. ”

    If things were done right, “infection” would be a far cry from a positive PCR test.

    “You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it,” Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics told me. “You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.”

    I asked Dr. Rasnick what advice he has for people who want to be tested for COVID-19.

    “Don’t do it, I say, when people ask me,” he replies. “No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable.” …

    “Every time somebody takes a swab, a tissue sample of their DNA, it goes into a government database. It’s to track us,” says David Rasnick. “They’re not just looking for the virus. Please put that in your article.” …

    PCR is a needle in a haystack technology that can be extremely misleading in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases.” The first conflict between this revolutionary technology and human life happened on the battlefield of AIDS, and [Kary] Mullis himself came to the front line arguing against PCR as diagnostic tool. …

    “In one paper,” Crowe says, “I found 37 cycles. If you didn’t get enough fluorescence by 37 cycles, you are considered negative. In another, paper, the cutoff was 36. Thirty-seven to 40 were considered “indeterminate.” And if you got in that range, then you did more testing. I’ve only seen two papers that described what the limit was. So, it’s quite possible that different hospitals, different States, Canada versus the US, Italy versus France are all using different cutoff sensitivity standards of the Covid test. So, if you cut off at 20, everybody would be negative. If you cut off a 50, you might have everybody positive.” …

    David, in his quiet Canadian way, dropped a bombshell in his next statement:

    “I think if a country said, “You know, we need to end this epidemic,” They could quietly send around a memo saying: “We shouldn’t be having the cutoff at 37. If we put it at 32, the number of positive tests drops dramatically. If it’s still not enough, well, you know, 30 or 28 or something like that. So, you can control the sensitivity.” …

    1. Thresholds aside, I don’t understand how they determine that a test is valid. The standard seems to be the test itself, which makes the whole thing meaningless.

      If you show up positive, you’re presumed positive, because the test is presumed to work. But based on what? How do we verify that? Obviously not by symptoms, since they also tell us that a huge percentage of infected people are asymptomatic. So it would seem that the whole concept is purely a construct.

Leave a Reply