Waning Immunogenicity, Vaccine-Driven Evolution and Hyperimmunization: We Can No Longer Deny the Obvious

UPDATE: HELP ME BUILD THE WWDNYK STUDIO 

NB: This article was originally published on Medium but that account was silenced following publication.

“GET YOUR VACCINES! HERD IMMUNITY! You anti-vaxxers are putting other people at risk!”

This level of ‘debate’ is an emotional appeal to fear and is a form of coercion.

In reality, many current vaccines have reached the limit of their usefulness, and there is no hiding it.

Worse, some current vaccines may make the vaccinated more susceptible to infection from the very pathogens they were designed to immunize against- or other pathogens that the vaccine does not target.

I’ve looked at toxicity of metals like aluminum and mercury in great detail and find a great deal of support in the scientific literature for serious issues with injection of thimerosal and aluminum. Tens of thousands of hours and two and half papers later, we have a viable theory for how vaccines can cause autism, and we have a determination that a series of mistakes have led to doses of aluminum in vaccines that are intolerably unsafe for some.

I’m now of the opinion that if you are partaking of aluminum-containing vaccines, you should never accept a thimerosal-containing vaccine due to additive toxicity. And if one does choose to vaccinate with aluminum-containing vaccines, one should never accept a thimerosal-containing vaccine due to synergistic toxicity. I’m also of the opinion that digging up metals and injecting them into our newborns and our expectant mothers is, well, quite possibly the most stupid idea from medicine. Ever.

I am sharing bluntly from an informed position. My forthcoming review on the role of aluminum and mercury in autism has 250 references, all supporting a key role of vaccine metals in inducing — with the help of some inherited and de novo mutations — ER Hyperstress. Our just-published reconsideration of aluminum study took over a year in peer review — the editor graciously handled the process and the paper was vetted in the end, by an additional three independent reviewers. There is no question in my mind that there is too much aluminum in the CDC vaccine schedule for some, and there is no credible basis for the dosing of aluminum in vaccines, period. This is not hyperbole, we did the math.

The Flu Vaccine Makes Us More Susceptible to Acute Infections from Non-Influenza Respiratory Viruses

Studies are confirming that vaccination against the flu virus leads to increased rates of respiratory infections by non-influenza viruses. See, for example, Rikin et al., 2018 who wrote Among children there was an increase in the hazard of ARI caused by non-influenza respiratory pathogens post-influenza vaccination compared to unvaccinated children during the same period. and “Post-vaccination risk of non-influenza respiratory pathogen was higher in children”. This is in the journal VACCINES.

This finding confirms the work of Ben Cowling and colleagues from 2012: Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza.

See Rikin et al (2018) Vaccine 36:1958-1964 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29525279

Public health policy around influenza must change so deaths due to “flu-like illnesses” are no longer considered deaths due to influenza. Every cadaver should be swabbed for an exact determination of the virus(es) involved — again, another policy update needed. Americans deserve to know what they are dying from.

But the issue for today is waning immunity. Emblazoned across CNN’s website— complete with a video that includes artificial immunization 101, sure to tell you serious side effects are rare.

“Mumps outbreaks linked to waning vaccine protection, study says” is the headline. But no problem, goes the article, because ACIP has recommended another MMR booster. The article claims that mumps symptoms are reduced by the vaccine. But it skips over the smoking guns in the room, including the major whistleblower lawsuit against Merck for allegedly faking the efficacy of the mumps portion of the vaccine. If you believe the whistleblowers, the MMR vaccine is only 18% effective against the Jeryl Lynn type — so the efficacy must be even lower against the circulating types due to 55 years of antigen drift.

What’s causing waning immunity in vaccines?

The flu vaccine, we were told, was only 10–18% effective this year. I’ve analyzed trends of flu vaccine efficacy and found that higher vaccine uptake in any given two years is associated with decreased efficacy of the vaccine in the next year. I’m convinced that part of that is immune system compromise due to the effects of thimerosal on the protein ERAP1 — which is essential for proper shortening of immune proteins.

The other problem is that viruses evolve. They experience mutations in the wild — and the strains in the vaccines experience mutations in the cultures in which they are grown. The mumps vaccine uses the Jeryl Lynn strain of mumps — isolated from a throat culture of the daughter of Dr. Maurice Hilleman in 1963.

Jeryl Lynn at home with the mumps, 1955.
Jeryl Lynn (left) watches her sister receiving the mumps vaccine developed by her father (right). The virus used was isolated from Jeryl Lynn during her obviously non-fatal mumps infection.

Fifty-five years later, we’re seeing mumps outbreaks involving fully vaccinated individuals. At Syracuse University, every student was up-to-date on the vaccines. The canceling of sports events raised the ire of fans of the Orangemen.

To calculate the number of mutational differences between the 2018 circulating strains and the 1955 strain should be straightforward — sequence the stored isolates and sequence the currently circulated strains. In mumps, this has been done every year — and while overall the predicted amino acid sequences are very similar, for some wild type mumps isolates, protein divergence from the Jeryl Lynn strain are much higher- with divergence as high as 15% (See example study here). Faster divergence in some proteins than others is confirmed in a study conducted on isolates in China.

But, as I’ve said about Ebola — it’s not the rate, it’s the mutation. A series of individual mutations, or a single mutation could render the MMR significantly less effective than it had been in previous years. Or, a new strain of the mumps could come into prominence due to the efficacy of the mumps vaccine.

The disease burden from vaccination is not adequately assessed. Here are some facts worth considering:

(1) Vaccine Adverse Event Are 100- to 1,000-fold Under-reported.. or More. An automated system designed to capture vaccine adverse events was developed and abandoned by CDC after discovery of the massive increase in reporting of adverse events. The creators of the system, which is called ESP-VAERS, reported that only 1% of adverse events are typically detected by VAERS, the passive system for reporting vaccine adverse events.

(2) Live Vaccine Types Can Directly Cause Disease. Persistent infection of mumps wild-type virus (Jeryl Lynn 5 mumps virus) has been detected in cases of chronic encephalitis. (See Morfopoulou et al.) This evidence is as strong as the evidence used by CDC to conclude that Zika contributed to microcephaly in Brazil.

(3) Whooping Cough Bug Persists in Vaccinated Medical Professionals.Medical professionals, including pediatricians, who vaccinate every ten years against pertussis may be the reservoir of wild-type infectious because they are not immune to B. pertussis, the bacterium that causes whooping cough-they just show no symptoms. (See my article at World Mercury Project). Medical professionals should be swabbed every Monday morning for asymptomatic B. pertussis infection.

(5) Type Replacement is Real. Type replacement is accepted in influenza, and always has been. It is denied by CDC to be occurring in HPV vaccinated populations, in spite of the fact that most studies show type replacement (See my article on this in Epoch Times). The CDC’s own study (Markovitz et al. (2016)) found no net change in overall HPV infection rates after the 4-valent HPV vaccines came to market but somehow concluded that their data did not support type replacement.

We at IPAK have re-analyzed the Markovitz study data in the simplest manner possible to ask a very simple question: Was there a significant shift in the prevalence of non-vaccine targeted types after the introduction of the 4-valent HPV vaccine? Recall that Markovitz et al. (2016) concluded that no type replacement had occurred after the HPV 4-valent vaccine had been brought to market.

The study data were ambiguously labeled with a column “non-4v HPV” but a close read of the text points to “Any HPV” — “4v HPV” vs. “non-4v HPV” as the data of interest to use in a 2 x 2 contingency test. We used Fisher’s exact test on counts (not frequencies). Counts were estimated from the prevalence data, data are represented as percentages for clarity.

Here is the result:

CDC Study Actually Supports Type Replacement in HPV Vaccinated Populations

Fisher’s exact test on the count data was significant at p<0.0001.

This means that for HPV, type replacement is real. Due to using weak statistical testing, when more powerful tests are available, CDC can be considered culpable for new infections that occur when doctors tell patients “you are protected from HPV”. In my view, the Markovitz et al. paper should be retracted because it is misleading, and clinicians should warn patients that they could still be infected with rarer, potentially more dangerous types of HPV if they have other risk factors (unprotected sex, multiple sex partners, drug use, etc). To be fair, I contacted CDC some time ago and asked them to consider whether their data might necessarily show type replacement, like other studies published at that time had shown. Dr. Markovitz declined direct dialog, and an underling stopped replying after I pointed out the obvious.

In 2016, the world shifted to a new polio vaccine that was developed to increase the match between the vaccine-targeted wild type and the type in the vaccine. Viral type replacement is a form of evolution is well-accepted — that it can lead to to the circulation of hyperpathogenic strains is evident, but not well appreciated by vaccine policies.

Denial of type replacement in HPV is harmful and unscientific. And, I would add, possibly quite dangerous.

Why? First, the rarer HPV types are not harmless. In fact, host-pathogen interaction studies and models of virulence in pathogens tell us that common types of pathogens are common because they don’t kill their host. Rarer types of HPV may lead to more aggressive HPV-related cancers in younger people. This is supported by data; see, for example, this study that that HPV genotypes not targeted by quadrivalent vaccine types conferred 2.94 fold higher risk of cervical carcinoma. And rare types not targeted by the 9-valent HPV vaccine also have been found to be oncogenic.

In spite of attempts of individuals to claim that data show that HPV vaccine reduces HPV-related cancers rates, one must always read the fine-print. The studies look at surrogate outcome (CIN rates), and they often only report rates of CIN lesions associated with vaccine-targeted HPV types. We may not know if rarer types sweep into populations and increase overall HPV-related cancer rates for decades.

The second reason that HPV vaccination-induced type replacement is possibly quite dangerous is that both intra-typic and inter-typic recombination could lead to increased new types of pathogenicity. With hundreds of rare types, those that increase in frequency due to vaccination may be different in different parts of the world. Evolution is fastest in semi-divided populations with gene flow due to low migration rates and high genetic diversity within subpopulations. And recombination occurs in HPV. This study shows recombination occurring between European and African HPV types.

Interestingly, impaired normal recombination of the human genome is the virus’ cancer-causing calling card. As an evolutionary biologist, I’d say that enabling recombination among types is part of this virus’s phenotype. Evolution loves diversity. Evidence of recombination among HPV types is strong (see for example this study). And since recombination is most likely to occur between different HPV types in individuals with >1 HPV types, prevention of exposure to new HPV types in individuals who are already infected is very important.

Evidence of vaccine-driven evolution also exists for many other vaccine-targeted pathogens, including B. pertussis (See Octavia et al., 2011). Evidence of waning immunity in mumps is growing; high variation exists in the amount of serum required from any given individual to neutralize genetically diverse mumps strains. The vaccine target protein, a nucleoprotein, is a non-neutralizing target. Asymptomatic wild-type infections are known to occur in mumps after vaccination, and the age distribution of occurrence has shifted. A quick BLAST of the Jeryl Lynn nucleoprotein amino acid sequence against all mumps nucleoprotein sequences in NCBI’s Protein database reveals variation as high as 6% (in a mumps virus isolated from China). The Jeryl Lynn mumps type appears to be an immunologic outlier compared to other types of mumps. A new cluster subgroup of Genotype G seems to have driven an outbreak of mumps in Scotland in a highly vaccinated population. And molecular analysis of isolates from the current Dutch and American mumps cases point to newly emergent types with variation in the immunogenic epitopes — leading to a call for a polyvalent mumps vaccine. While a model could account for waning immunity due to a 27-year immunity, and dismissed a role for the emergence of heterologous virus genotypes, that approach begs the question of what proportion of the loss of the presumed 27-year protection is due to viral evolution. The current 18–20 year old age-class has been exposed to more doses and total amounts of injected forms of aluminum — and more immunogenic antigens from pathogens than any other class before them.

Lower-than expected efficacy of the mumps vaccine is reflected in cross-genotype seroresponse studies, has been suspected by others, and has been reported by the two Merck whistleblowers.

The rates of clinically diagnosed cases of mumps skyrocketed in Western Australia in 2015 and 2016:

Source: Vaccination Status is Not a Determinant of Susceptibility to Mumps (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJcWlBQ6dHo)

This explosion of cases began in April 2015, the same month in which influenza vaccines were made freely available to aboriginal peoples (see “For the First Time”, here: http://iaha.com.au/naccho-health-news-indigenous-children-now-able-to-access-free-flu-vaccine-in-australia/).

Here is the timeline of cases:

See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJcWlBQ6dHo

And the age distribution, by Aboriginal status. The outbreak involved only the Aboriginal population — and mumps can lead to sterility, as the presenter of these images describe in this video.

See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJcWlBQ6dHo

Clearly, the FluQuadri and FluQuadri, Jr. vaccine may have an an unforeseen effect on the aboriginal population. Hyperimmunization could be responsible. (Neither vaccine contains thimerosal, according to the vaccine manufacturer The product insert from 2015 is available via the WayBack machine.)

This is what happens when we do whole-population experimentation without informed consent and do not insist on randomized clinical trials to assess long-term safety of vaccines and vaccine schedules before unleashing them on to an uninformed, non-consented population. None of the patients — Aboriginals or not — were informed they were part of a safety testing for Sanofi-Pasteur’s new vaccine. However, additional vaccines were also used and it is possible that simultaneous administration of aluminum-containing vaccines occurred.

In general, the sources of waning immunity are likely two-fold: the damaging effects of metals in non-live vaccines on the immune system, combined with vaccine driven evolution (antigenic drift) leading to type replacement.

Discussions of “breakthrough infections” in populations vaccinated against mumps should consider the importance of individual amino acid differences in viral biology and immune escape.

Jeryl Lynn, like the mumps viruses, has changed a bit since 1955.

Image © Ramin Rahimian https://raminphoto.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/jeryl-lynn-hilleman-for-the-new-york-times/

It’s time for a ruling on the MMR efficacy controversy, and for research on safer and and more effective means of artificial immunization. And it’s time that governments in countries that use vaccines to inform their populations that post-marketing surveillance studies mean they are enrolled in safety studies, and that they have the right to expect that the medical professional will honor their basic human right to opt out of any such study under laws inspired by The Nuremberg Code. There are many reasons why that is the right thing to do… reason #1 for me is that, in spite of what we had all hoped, vaccines are no longer what they used to be.

You can find me on Twitter James Lyons-Weiler

and on

WordPress http://jameslyonsweiler.com

Or at work:

Lyons-Weiler, J and R. Ricketson. 2018. Reconsideration of the Immunotherapeutic Pediatric Safe Dose Levels of Aluminum. Journal and Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 48:67–73

http://ipaknowledge.org/Pediatric-Dosing-of-Aluminum.php

Senapati R et al. 2017. HPV genotypes co-infections associated with cervical carcinoma: Special focus on phylogenetically related and non-vaccine targeted genotypes. PLoS One. 12(11):e0187844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187844.

Advertisements

23 thoughts on “Waning Immunogenicity, Vaccine-Driven Evolution and Hyperimmunization: We Can No Longer Deny the Obvious

  1. Another informative article. Thank you.
    Question:
    Dr. Gregory Poland published 2 articles:
    -Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1815-20.
    Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized persons.
    Poland GA1, Jacobson RM.
    Conclusion: The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons.
    Paper: The Re-Emergence of Measles in Developed Countries: Time to Develop the Next-Generation Measles Vaccines?
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905323/
    Outbreaks of measles have continued to occur around the country and the CDC/HHS/FDA & the government have been using this as means to eliminate medical autonomy. Obviously the vaccine isn’t working and it’s shedding if you have read the study from: Journal of Clinical Microbiology which reported that during the 2015 Disneyland Measles outbreak, it was determined that 73 of the 194 measles cases were from the vaccine:
    During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees. Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences (R. J. McNall, unpublished data). (Source.)
    Rebecca J. McNall, a co-author of this study, is a CDC official in the Division of Viral Diseases. So the CDC has the data proving that some measles outbreaks are, at least in part, caused by the vaccine.
    So the vaccine isn’t working, it’s shedding and my question is if it provided any protection how long would that be? 2 years? Maybe 5? Waning immunity is mentioned as a reason for a 3rd shot so I’m trying to figure out what the magic number is because the schedule has gone from 1 shot, which was just the measles portion which was going to eradicate measles in 1967 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1919891/pdf/pubhealthreporig00027-0069.pdf) with 1 shot to a multi-shot that isn’t doing it either. When do you think immunity wanes in your professional opinion? I’ve read it’s now less than 2 years.

    Like

    1. ” Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015,”

      That is not the same as all measles cases in the outbreak. That is how many samples across the USA were sent to the lab for testing from any source at any point in the year from any condition.

      To say that means much of the measles from the outbreak was vaccine related from that evidence is mistaken or deceitful.

      Like

      1. First I NEVER said all Measles outbreaks were a result of Vaccine viral shedding. This was to show you that there is proof that vaccinated people are shedding viruses and infecting people. In the case of the 2015 Disney Measles outbreak mentioned in the study Journal of Clinical Microbiology, according to CDC’s Dr. Ann Schuchat has stated that PATIENT ZERO- HAS NEVER BEEN FOUND. She presented this info in 2015 on Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). Since the measles virus can survive for 2 hours on an infected surface I wouldn’t be surprised if CDC/Pharma didn’t help the outbreak along. But if you need to know that a fully vaccinated person can start an outbreak here is a case for you:

        -Study titled, “Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City, 2011,” Oxford Journal. The groundbreaking study acknowledged that, “Measles may occur in vaccinated individuals, but secondary transmission from such individuals has not been documented. A 2011 measles outbreak in NYC. They focused on one patient who had received two doses of measles-containing vaccine and found that, “Of 88 contacts, four secondary cases were confirmed that had either two doses of measles-containing vaccine or a past positive measles IgG antibody. All cases had laboratory confirmation of measles infection, clinical symptoms consistent with measles, and high avidity IgG antibody characteristic of a secondary immune response.”Their remarkable conclusion: A twice-vaccinated individual, from a NYC measles outbreak, was found to have transmitted measles to four of her contacts, two of which themselves had received two doses of MMR vaccine and had prior presumably protective measles IgG antibody results.

        88 people became infected from ONE fully vaccinated individual. Viral Vaccine Shedding!

        But the CDC knows live vaccines shed. Here is St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital Visitors Guidelines:

        Like

      2. A sobering reality is that all vaccine components shed. This means that the MANDATORY RABIES vaccine that is given to all pets are being shed to the pet owners. There are two forms of rabies: Furious and Dumb. That pretty much covers the entire population of North America. There is a literal Jihad on free thought and self-direction in the greatest open-air prison on the planet. I trace it back to the effects of rabies domesticus.

        Like

  2. You write “I’m convinced that part of that is immune system compromise due to the effects of thimerosal”

    Then go on to note the quadrivalent flu vaccine has no thiomersal. In fact, no vaccine on the american schedule has thiomersal.

    Like

    1. -Influenza Virus Vaccine
      FluLaval (Quadrivalent)

      ID Biomedical Corporation of Quebec
      2016-2017 allantoic cavity of embryonated hens’ eggs, formaldehyde, sodium deoxycholate thimerosal, ovalbumin, formaldehyde, sodium deoxycholate, a-tocopheryl hydrogen succinate, polysorbate 80

      Influenza Virus Vaccine
      Fluzone (Quadrivalent): Standard, High Dose, & Intradermal

      -Sanofi Pasteur, Inc.
      2016-2017
      embryonated chicken eggs, Octylphenol Ethoxylate (Triton X-100), sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution, formaldehyde, linear sucrose density gradient solution formaldehyde, octylphenol ethoxylate (Triton X-100), sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution, gelatin (standard formulation only), thimerosal (standard dosage multi-dose vial only)

      CDC website.

      Like

      1. So if the thiomersal is gone from all but the multidose vials of the flu vaccine (20% of all fluvax manufactured) why hasn’t autism gone?

        Like

      2. Peter:
        As Patrick wrote there is a trace amount of mercury or thiomersal in vaccines. The CDC says trace amounts are acceptable despite the fact the EPA says any amount of mercury is toxic. Read his comment.

        Like

    2. Absolute rubbish. A ‘mercury free’ vaccine is one where there is no ADDED mercury but it is fully allowed to have thimerosal in the final product from the steps leading up to the final product. ‘Mercury free’ vaccines have an ‘allowable limit’ of mercury in them to fit the fraud that that ‘mercury free’ label has been allowed to be presumed by the Herd. ANY level of mercury is toxic and a radical generator until it is quenched and those radicals generated keep the pinball game going until they are quenched. The State of Illinois allowed poisoners to continue to recommend and use labeled mercury containing vaccines until the stocks were used up.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Peter:
        Misleading Mercury-exposure Comparisons: Thimerosal-preserved Flu Shot Versus the Eating of Tuna Fish by: Paul G. King, PhD Initial Comments
        First of all the common statement:
        “My doctor says there is more mercury in a can of tuna fish than in a vaccination” is intentionally misleading for several reasons including, but not limited to:
        A.The statement provides no basis values for comparison;
        B.It ignores the differences in the mode of administration between tuna fish (which is eaten) and a vaccine (which is injected);
        C.It ignores the reality that really young (< 1-year-old) American children do not eat any tuna fish but they are allowed be given Thimerosal-preserved vaccine doses – including,
        1.In 2009, twice as many doses of flu shots that they would have been recommended to receive prior to 2009 and
        2.Infinitely more than the dose of Thimerosal they would have been recommended to receive from a flu shot before 2002 because, prior to 2002,
        a.The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) did not recommend that children get a Thimerosal-preserved flu shot and
        b.All U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved [FDA-approved] flu vaccines were Thimerosal-preserved inactivated-influenza vaccines);
        D.It ignores the reality that most of the mercury in the tuna fish that is eaten is not absorbed by the human body but excreted in the feces w/o being absorbed, and
        E.It ignores the CRITICAL difference in peak dose where:
        1.The maximum level of Hg from the vaccination occurs almost immediately after injection; but 2.The maximum level in the mercury absorbed from eating fish:
        a.Takes hours to be reached and
        b.Is only some fraction of the dose in the eaten tuna fish is absorbed [from animal studies, the fraction absorbed is typically <25 %) of the dose consumed.
        You can read the remaining four pages at this link: http://mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/091129_MisleadingMercuryexposureComparisonsb.pdf
        Mercury – University of Calgary Study-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73XyJq9Z3-k&t=44s
        How Mercury Causes Brain Neuron Damage – Uni. of Calgary-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU8nSn5Ezd8
        EMAILS FROM CDC AND FDA ON VACCINES AND MERCURY-https://www.ageofautism.com/2007/12/emails-from-cdc.html
        Here is a quote from an 8/13/2006 article by Evelyn Pringle on the "Best Syndication" web site. http://www.bestsyndication.com/?q=081306_government_investigation_vaccines.htm
        "To see if vaccines were indeed thimerosal free, last year the group, Health Advocacy in the Public Interest (HAPI), sent four vials of different vaccines to be tested for mercury content to Doctor's Data, an independent lab, which specializes in heavy metal testing.
        "The tests found that all four contained mercury, despite the claim by 2 companies that their vaccines were completely mercury-free. According to HAPI, all four vaccines also contained aluminum which greatly increases the toxicity of mercury for causing neuronal death in the brain.
        "In fact, during further investigation, HAPI discovered that mercury-based thimerosal was still being used during the production process for most vaccines. The drug makers claim that after production, they filter the preservative out of the final vaccines.
        "However, heavy metal expert, Dr Boyd Haley, PhD, the Chemistry Department Chair at the University of Kentucky, told HAPI that its not possible to remove all of the thimerosal because mercury binds to the antigenic protein in the vaccine and cannot be filtered out completely.

        Liked by 1 person

      1. by type, manufactured lots, doses or administered? For someone scientifically and statistically trained who hates laziness, you’re not the best at keeping to your own precepts. By doses produced in the US 20% will be in multi-dose vials with thiomersal.

        Like

  3. Aluminum:
    Great video by Dr. Chris Shaw
    Aluminum is an adjuvant in vaccines, there’s only one study to show effects it could have on humans

    This is an exchange between Dr. Stanley Plotkin’s the God-father of Vaccines and Mr. Aaron Siri that occurred when he was deposed on January 11, 2018 for a custody case in Michigan. Plotkins volunteered to be an expert witness and after he was deposed on January 11, 2018-he withdrew from the case the morning of January 12, 2018.

    MMR was grandfathered in. No testing pre-licensed p 170 Page 206-7, 217, 221, 229 Q Handing you, Dr. Plotkin, what’s been marked as Plaintiff’s Exhibit 20. The title of this report is “Adverse Events Associated with Childhood
    Vaccines,” correct? p. 245,

    p.294 And alum, injected alum can increase the production of all kinds of cytokines, including IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-17, correct?

    A Yes.

    Q Alum can be recovered from the injection site months or years after intramuscular injections, correct?

    A Well, it’s, yeah, it’s possible to find the alum. Of course, aluminum is a frequent, shall I say, present in all of us? We ingest a lot of it.

    Q I’m talking about injected aluminum. I’m asking, can it be recovered from the injection site months or years after intramuscular injection?

    A I believe it’s possible, yes.

    Q In your book that you’re holding in front of you, do you know if it says, quote: It is established that aluminum salt can be recovered at the injection site months or years after intramuscular injections?

    A Well, I’d have to look at it, but I don’t doubt that that’s, that could be in the book, yes.

    For the next 15-20 pages Dr. Plotkins praises Dr. Shaw’s work but than tries to minimize and quasi dismiss it because Dr. Shaw knows Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic. Plotkins admitted that aluminum can travel to the brains and confirmed studies demonstrated that in autistic children who died prematurely. (he frequently preferenced things he wrote in his book Vaccines (considered by Bill Gates to be the bible of vaccines by saying he have to read the study) This deposition is quite an eye opener for those who carry the mantra vaccines have been tested to be safe and effective when there has NEVER been a Randomized Double Blind Placebo Based Controlled Clinical Trials on any vaccine except the Measles and that was not with a control group or placebo. Plotkins says this kind of testing would be ideal but it hasn’t been done pre-licening and distribution to the public. NO Safety trials. According to what Mr Siri exposed is the MMR was Grandfathered in because there is no testing information on the vaccine manufactures insert. Plotkins couldn’t explain it away saying it is the responsibility of the FDA to make that info available. Read the deposition: STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND 3 FAMILY DIVISION. VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF STANLEY A. PLOTKIN, M.D. 11 New Hope, Pennsylvania January 11, 2018
    LORI MATHESON,f/k/a LORI ANN SCHMITT, Plaintiff,
    vs. MICHAEL SCHMITT, Defendant.
    https://www.docdroid.net/8zJh4QQ/1-11-18-matheson-plotkin.pdf
    You can also listen to the video and read along. The entire unedited 9 hour deposition is on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXTaJjfGNAI).

    Like

      1. “there has NEVER been a Randomized Double Blind Placebo Based Controlled Clinical Trials on any vaccine” – codetalker

        that for some reason now must be pre-licensing, you can find more in the Gardasil application:

        Food and Drug Administration, Clinical Review of Biologics License Application for Human Papillomavirus 6, 11, 16, 18 L1 Virus Like Particle Vaccine (S. cerevisiae) (STN 125126 GARDASIL), manufactured by Merck, Inc, Vaccines Clinical Trial Branch, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Editor. 2006, Food and Drug Administration.

        Tested against two placebo controls, vaccine-less but otherwise complete carriers and a salt solution.

        Like

  4. 1923 Aluminum used to flocculate toxins by adsorption described by Gaston Ramon then Hartley. Diphtheria and Tetanus were primary toxins under study. Aluminum has been used exclusively as a vaccine Adjuvant ever since, but the NATO book Immunological Adjuvants and Vaccines, 1988 states that if Aluminum was to be evaluated by a review panel for ingredients in biological medicines IT WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED!

    Aluminum oxidizes TP53 suppressor oncogene resulting in mutations leading to Cancer. The World Health Organization in 1999 ranked Aluminum a level 3 carcinogen on a scale of 4.

    Malice Aforethought. Fraud and Murder have no statute of limitations.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Patrick Jordan
    “Unless you are training for the Head Kung Fu which was actually done by hitting your head against a solid stone wall, there is no sense in engaging with someone who is a co-conspirator in a crime.”

    I appreciate your perspective and others that feel as you do but one of the reasons I comment is to pass along information for people who are just becoming aware of the crimes and the sheer magnitude of corruption in the vaccine orbit. It gives others a starting place of valid info such as the multiple admissions by Stanley Plotkin about how vaccines are not tested for safety, efficiency, nor do they follow the Gold Standard of Scientific Research of using a Randomized Double Blind Placebo Based Controlled Clinical Trials pre- licensing of vaccines on the childhood schedule. Nor are there any studies that uses a Randomized Double Blind Placebo Based Controlled to declare if vaccination has had any impact on disease reduction and deaths in the world. That would be the study the CDC has refused to do, health of unvaccinated children compared to vaccinated children, using the excuse that they a. can’t find enough unvaccinated children to do the study b. it would be unethical to not give a child vaccines to do a study and than turn around and B & M because they say there are over a million unvaccinated children in the US. Replying to comments that are CDC/Pharma propaganda (especially the do you eat fish response to a thimerosal comment-which by the way is an old TROLL comment that I didn’t know was still floating around. Dorit liked to use this one often years ago) provides a window into how trolls do the bidding of the government & pharma. My perspective is push back with independent verifiable information is essential.

    Like

    1. Well, now, you see: you ARE training in the Head Kung Fu, which when perfected could leave a chip in a rock wall. I admire your attention to those who need the ability to see through fraud and answer it directly. Between you and me (and the NSA): Vegans don’t eat fish.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s